SAUSD HQ — A California administrative law judge has ruled that the Santa Ana Unified School District (SAUSD) may proceed with mass layoffs affecting up to 276 certificated staff—including teachers, counselors, and instructional specialists—for the 2025–2026 school year.
The ruling, issued by Judge Eric Sawyer on May 12 following a five-day hearing in April, largely upheld the District’s justification for the layoffs, which stem from a major budget stabilization effort and staff surplus.
Initially, SAUSD planned to eliminate 386 full-time equivalent (FTE) positions. However, this number reflects workload—not headcount. Because some employees work part-time or share positions, cutting 386 FTEs does not mean 386 people are being laid off.
After accounting for retirements, resignations, reassignments, and legal challenges, the number of actual layoff notices dropped to 276. The judge then removed 18 individuals from the list due to errors—such as being bumped by unqualified colleagues or having credentials that were overlooked.
| Position |
FTEs Cut |
| Elementary Teacher (Multiple Subjects) | 140 |
| Transitional Kindergarten Teacher | 12 |
| Math Teacher | 26 |
| English Teacher | 44 |
| Social Science Teacher | 16 |
| Curriculum Specialist | 16 |
| Itinerant Support Teacher | 20 |
| Home & Hospital Teacher | 5 |
| Teacher on Special Assignment (TOSA) | 17 |
| Counselor – 192 Day | 27 |
| Counselor – 202 Day | 20 |
| Counselor Coach | 4 |
| Instructional Coach – Future Ready | 39 |
| Total | 386 |
Source: Santa Ana Unified, ACJ Ruling 05/12/2025
NOTE: These cuts in positions does not mean the number of actual staff being laid off. That number sits at 276 from The Santanero’s understanding.
The judge found that most of the District’s layoffs were legally justified and followed required procedures.
However, some errors were identified—such as bilingual teachers being replaced by less-qualified staff, and counselors being laid off based on the number of workdays rather than seniority.
The court also ruled that Speech and Debate coaches did not qualify for the same layoff protections as sports coaches.
Tie-breaker decisions were handled using a weighted point system, and in cases of exact ties, a digital lottery was used to determine seniority.
Ron Hacker, SAUSD’s Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Superintendent, noted in a phone call Thursday that Judge Sawyer’s ruling is “technically not binding,” meaning the Board is not required to accept it fully.
A special board meeting is scheduled for Monday, where trustees will vote on whether to adopt the ruling’s findings and move forward with final layoff decisions.
SAUSD HQ — A California administrative law judge has ruled that the Santa Ana Unified School District (SAUSD) may proceed with mass layoffs affecting up to 276 certificated staff—including teachers, counselors, and instructional specialists—for the 2025–2026 school year.
The ruling, issued by Judge Eric Sawyer on May 12 following a five-day hearing in April, largely upheld the District’s justification for the layoffs, which stem from a major budget stabilization effort and staff surplus.
Initially, SAUSD planned to eliminate 386 full-time equivalent (FTE) positions. However, this number reflects workload—not headcount. Because some employees work part-time or share positions, cutting 386 FTEs does not mean 386 people are being laid off.
After accounting for retirements, resignations, reassignments, and legal challenges, the number of actual layoff notices dropped to 276. The judge then removed 18 individuals from the list due to errors—such as being bumped by unqualified colleagues or having credentials that were overlooked.
Source: Santa Ana Unified, ACJ Ruling 05/12/2025
NOTE: These cuts in positions does not mean the number of actual staff being laid off. That number sits at 276 from The Santanero’s understanding.
The judge found that most of the District’s layoffs were legally justified and followed required procedures.
However, some errors were identified—such as bilingual teachers being replaced by less-qualified staff, and counselors being laid off based on the number of workdays rather than seniority.
The court also ruled that Speech and Debate coaches did not qualify for the same layoff protections as sports coaches.
Tie-breaker decisions were handled using a weighted point system, and in cases of exact ties, a digital lottery was used to determine seniority.
Ron Hacker, SAUSD’s Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Superintendent, noted in a phone call Thursday that Judge Sawyer’s ruling is “technically not binding,” meaning the Board is not required to accept it fully.
A special board meeting is scheduled for Monday, where trustees will vote on whether to adopt the ruling’s findings and move forward with final layoff decisions.
Read Next
Lorin Griset student dies by suicide, SAUSD confrims
The Kids Are Not Alright.
Santa Ana Police received 42 immigration enforcement notices, withheld telling public
According to publication Inadvertent, a public records request shows that ICE and/or DHS notified Santa Ana Police of enforcement activities and did not tell the public.
SAUSD shifts stance in third statement, clears players amid ongoing CIF baseball sanctions
Santa Ana Unified issued a revised statement clearing Segerstrom student-athletes of rule violations, as protests, petitions, and pending records requests keep tensions high.